Technology due diligence, Day One readiness and post-deal integration delivered so the synergy case in the model survives contact with two real IT estates.
Technology is usually where deal value is won or quietly lost. The commercial model assumes synergies that depend on merging systems, consolidating licences and combining teams, yet the work to achieve that is rarely scoped before completion.
After Day One the practical questions arrive at once: which finance system survives, how staff get access, what happens to two overlapping ERP estates, and who owns the decision when both sides believe their platform is the better one.
Left to run on their own, integrations stall in parallel operation. Both estates stay live, both cost bases remain, and the synergy target moves quarter by quarter until it stops being reported.
We look at the estate, the synergy case and the operating model together, because a target that depends on a system consolidation nobody has costed is not really a target. That produces an integration plan tied to the value it is supposed to release.
Delivery is sequenced around Day One obligations first, then the consolidation work that actually releases cost. Decisions get named owners on both sides, so platform choices are made once rather than relitigated.
Representative engagement types. Scope is always shaped around the programme and the capability already in place.
An independent view of the target estate, its risks, its debt and the true cost of integrating it.
Access, identity, email and core services working from the first day of the new entity.
Two overlapping estates reduced to one, with a decision record behind each platform choice.
Untangling shared systems, data and licences so a business can operate independently.
Duplicate tooling identified and retired, with the savings attributed and tracked.
Named ownership across both organisations for the duration of the integration.
Practical working experience across these environments. We are not a reseller for any of them, so platform recommendations stay independent.
Delivered through whichever model fits the programme. Compare all delivery models
A defined diligence, Day One or consolidation phase with agreed milestones and acceptance criteria.
A full integration team spanning infrastructure, applications, data and programme management.
Due diligence, synergy validation and integration strategy.
Targeted migration, infrastructure or integration capacity for a deal phase.
A part-time integration lead across a deal pipeline where a permanent appointment is not yet warranted.
Yes, and it is usually cheaper to. Technology due diligence before completion tells you what integration will genuinely cost and whether the synergy case holds, which is far harder to renegotiate afterwards.
Not by default. Sequential integration often means paying for the same work repeatedly and running duplicate estates for longer. Where deals overlap, a shared target platform and a repeatable playbook usually cost less than handling one deal at a time.
Both. Some deals need one integration lead alongside the internal team; others need a full programme squad working across both organisations. The delivery models above set out how each is structured and governed.
That has to be settled by named owners against stated criteria, not by whoever holds out longest. We put the cost, risk and fit in front of the decision makers, and we record what was decided so it does not get reopened later.
InsightWhy the integration phase rather than the diligence phase decides whether deal value is realised.
Read the article
InsightThe cost of integrating acquisitions one at a time instead of to a shared target estate.
Read the articleInsightsCommentary on technology delivery, cloud, security and transformation from the Synnovate team.
Browse the blogTell us where you are in the deal cycle and we will set out the delivery model and the capability that fits.
Discuss your project